Grok Is Still Hosting Sexualized Deepfakes of Famous Women
A WIRED investigation found that Grok, the AI tool from Elon Musk's company xAI, still hosts dozens of nonconsensual sexualized deepfake images and videos of well-known women, including female celebrities and at least one prominent US politician. The findings landed months after xAI said it would fix the problem and the same week Canada's privacy watchdog ruled the company broke national privacy law. Regulators in several countries and US states continue to investigate, and multiple lawsuits are now in progress.
Key Takeaways
- WIRED reviewed public Grok.com links and found dozens of explicit, nonconsensual deepfakes of famous women, some posted to X only days before publication.
- The content persisted despite xAI publicly pledging earlier in 2026 to tighten its filters and restrict images of real people.
- Users got past safeguards by avoiding explicit words and describing scenes indirectly in their prompts.
- On June 11, 2026, the Privacy Commissioner of Canada ruled that xAI and X breached the country's federal privacy law (PIPEDA) by launching the tool without proper safeguards.
- At least eight regulators across multiple countries plus the California Attorney General have active inquiries, and several lawsuits have been filed.
- Rival AI services from OpenAI and Google tightened their protections, leaving Grok an outlier on this type of abuse.
Stats & Key Facts
- #6,700 sexually suggestive or nudified images per hour were generated during a January 5 to 6 analysis window.
- #That output measured 84 times the combined volume of the top five deepfake websites.
- #About 2 percent of roughly 20,000 images reviewed over one week appeared to depict people 18 or younger.
- #Close to 10 percent of 800 images recovered from the standalone Grok site showed photorealistic, very young people in sexual situations.
- #Ireland's data protection investigations into the matter grew to 244 by early March 2026.
- #An estimated 3 million explicit images were generated by Grok according to a January estimate cited in reporting.
WIRED Finds Nonconsensual Deepfakes Still Live on Grok.com
The core finding is that the abusive content never fully went away.
WIRED reviewed hundreds of public links on Grok.com and surfaced dozens of nonconsensual sexualized images and videos of famous women. The material included photorealistic depictions of women in sexual acts, full nudity, and captivity scenarios produced through the Grok Imagine system.
Some of the flagged content had appeared on X only days before WIRED published. The reporting named US Representative Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez among those depicted, alongside female celebrities. After journalists asked about specific items, xAI quietly removed flagged content.
How Users Slipped Past xAI's Filters
The workaround was simple wording, not advanced hacking.
- ›Users avoided explicit terms in their prompts to dodge keyword-based blocks.
- ›They described scenes indirectly so the system would still produce graphic results.
- ›Deepfake expert Henry Ajder and the Center for Countering Digital Hate, led by Imran Ahmed, pointed to gaps in the safeguards.
- ›Rival tools from OpenAI and Google had already tightened similar protections.
The Scale Dwarfs Existing Deepfake Sites
Independent analyses put the volume far above known abuse hubs.
A 24-hour analysis in early January estimated users prompted Grok to create 6,700 sexually suggestive or nudified images per hour. Researchers measured that rate at 84 times the combined output of the top five deepfake websites.
Over a week spanning late December into January, reviewers examined about 20,000 images, and roughly 2 percent appeared to show minors. A separate review of 800 images from the standalone Grok site found close to 10 percent depicted photorealistic, very young people in sexual situations. A January estimate cited in reporting put total explicit output near 3 million images.
Canada Rules xAI Broke Privacy Law
The watchdog finding arrived the same week as the WIRED report.
On June 11, 2026, the Privacy Commissioner of Canada concluded that xAI and X breached Canada's federal private-sector privacy law, PIPEDA. The investigation found the image tool launched without proper safeguards or enough thought about privacy harm, enabling global users to create and spread nonconsensual sexualized deepfakes.
Commissioner Philippe Dufresne said organizations have a legal obligation to protect Canadians' fundamental right to privacy. The companies agreed to content detection sweeps, quarterly reports, and independent third-party audits until the problem is resolved, though Dufresne pressed for stronger penalty powers under modernized law.
Regulators Across Several Countries Keep Investigating
The oversight stretches well beyond North America.
- ›California Attorney General Rob Bonta opened a state investigation in January 2026.
- ›The European Commission, Ireland's Data Protection Commission, and Britain's Ofcom and Information Commissioner's Office have active inquiries.
- ›Australia's eSafety office and the Paris public prosecutor are also examining the platform.
- ›Earlier in 2026, Indonesia, Malaysia, and the Philippines temporarily blocked Grok before access was restored.
Lawsuits Mount in the US and Britain
Victims and officials are turning to the courts.
Three Tennessee teenagers sued xAI in March 2026 over child sexual abuse images, and the city of Baltimore filed a consumer protection claim later that month. Ashley St. Clair filed an earlier suit in New York. In June, British Labour MP Jess Asato sued the company over its content.
The legal exposure has financial weight. Reporting referenced a May disclosure of SpaceX funds set aside for legal liabilities tied to the matter, signaling that xAI's leadership expects the litigation to continue across multiple jurisdictions.
Why This Matters for Everyday Readers and Business Owners
The story is a case study in AI safety failing in public.
The episode shows how quickly a consumer AI tool can be turned toward abuse when guardrails are weak or easy to talk around. For business readers, it is a reminder that content safeguards need testing against indirect prompts, not only banned words.
It also shows real legal consequences arriving fast. A single tool now faces privacy rulings, multi-country probes, and lawsuits in under a year, which raises the stakes for any company shipping image-generation features without strong protections in place from the start.
Frequently Asked Questions
What did the WIRED investigation actually find on Grok?
WIRED found dozens of nonconsensual sexualized deepfake images and videos of famous women hosted on Grok.com, including female celebrities and US Representative Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez. Some had been posted to X only days before publication.
Did xAI already promise to fix this problem?
Yes. xAI said earlier in 2026 it would tighten filters and restrict images of real people, but WIRED found abusive content still live months later. The company quietly removed flagged items after journalists asked about them.
How were users getting past the safety filters?
They avoided explicit words and described scenes indirectly in their prompts, which let the system produce graphic content without tripping keyword-based blocks.
What did Canada's privacy regulator decide?
On June 11, 2026, the Privacy Commissioner of Canada ruled that xAI and X breached the federal privacy law PIPEDA by launching the image tool without proper safeguards. Both companies agreed to detection sweeps, quarterly reports, and independent audits.
Who is taking legal action against xAI?
Plaintiffs include three Tennessee teenagers, the city of Baltimore, Ashley St. Clair in New York, and UK Labour MP Jess Asato. Regulators in several countries and the California Attorney General also have active investigations.
The WIRED findings show that Grok's deepfake problem persists despite repeated promises and growing legal pressure. With a Canadian privacy ruling, probes in multiple countries, and lawsuits stacking up, xAI faces sustained scrutiny over how it polices its image tools.
Continue Learning
Comments
Sign in to join the conversation