Reclaiming Social Engineering for Good
This essay argues that social engineering, now associated mainly with phishing scams, has a much older and more benign meaning: the deliberate shaping of human behavior at scale. It traces the term from early industrialists who wanted to manage human systems as carefully as machines, through its corruption by authoritarian regimes, to its modern reappearance under softer labels like personalization and behavioral nudges. The author calls for reclaiming the name and governing the practice openly.
Key Takeaways
- "Social engineering" sounds like something out of a conspiracy thriller, charged with totalitarian control and fringe paranoia.
More mundanely, it's come to be associated with phishing and other scams, in which fraudsters manipulate people into disclosing personal information.
- Tolman published Social Engineering , describing how U.S. industrialists optimized workers' conditions alongside manufacturing methods.
If industrialists could shape steel and electricity on demand, why not society itself?
- The same tools and managerial methods used to build highways and enact five-year plans worked for repression and mass control.
By the 1950s, "social engineering" had become a contaminated phrase.
- Language helps conceal these modern forms of social engineering.
- They succeed not through force but by exploiting trust.
Stats & Key Facts
- #The roots of engineering In 1894, Dutch entrepreneur Jacques van Marken urged companies to hire "social engineers" to manage human systems such as insurance, education, and profit sharing for workers as carefully as they did mechanical ones.
"Social engineering" sounds like something out of a conspiracy thriller, charged with totalitarian control and fringe paranoia. More mundanely, it's come to be associated with phishing and other scams, in which fraudsters manipulate people into disclosing personal information. Yet the concept is older and more benign: it is the deliberate shaping of human behavior, often at scale.
It predates silicon-and became pervasive, and ungoverned, especially once its practitioners learned to hide it. Authoritarian regimes and more recently scammers and big companies have profited from it. To defend ourselves from bad actors, and to benefit from social engineering's good side, we need to reclaim the name, and govern it prudently .
The roots of engineering In 1894, Dutch entrepreneur Jacques van Marken urged companies to hire "social engineers" to manage human systems such as insurance, education, and profit sharing for workers as carefully as they did mechanical ones. Fifteen years later, reformer William H. Tolman published Social Engineering , describing how U.S. industrialists optimized workers' conditions alongside manufacturing methods.
For more details please read the original article at IEEE Spectrum AI.
Continue Learning
Comments
Comments appear only after moderation. Your email identifies your submission to the moderator and is never displayed here.
No approved comments yet.